Stanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind - 1671 Words

Obedience: Does it have its limits? When individuals abandon their own freedom for the benefit of the larger group, they are no longer individuals but products of conformity. Obedience to authority can become dangerous when morals and independent thought are stifled to the point that harm is inflicted upon another person. The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders, even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrinds Review of Stanley Milgrams Experiments on Obedience says that Milgram†¦show more content†¦Milgrams experiment was believed to effect an alteration in the subjects self-image(Baumrind 332). Normal people would go into Milgrams lab expecting to just take part in an experiment, but would in fact be traumatized for possibly the rest of their life. Not only was se lf-image jeopardized, but so was the subjects trust in the experimenter. Because of this experiment, many of the adults that took part in this experiment are believed, by Baumrind, to have the inability to trust adult authorities in the future (332). When told the truth about the experiment, the subject was probably embarrassed and felt like a fool. Many of the subjects experienced severe distress after the experiment. This could be from the anger that they wanted to express towards the experimenter or from the shock of what had just happened to them. Baumrind makes some very convincing points about the disaster that is caused to many of the subjects, but Milgram believes differently. Milgram believed that this experiment provided a way of release for these sadistic impulses. While many might have had negative effects, many responded postively to the survey shown in Milgrams study. This experiment taught the subjects a little something about themselves. It also showed a side of the mselves that maybe they didnt know they had. It made many of them hope that they would deal more effectively with any future conflicts of values (Milgram 323). With the whole trust issue, if the experimenterShow MoreRelatedStanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind Essay1169 Words   |  5 PagesThe Controversy of Obedience A classic experiment on the natural obedience of individuals was designed and tested by a Yale psychologist, Stanley Milgram. The test forced participants to either go against their morals or violate authority. For the experiment, two people would come into the lab after being told they were testing memory loss, though only one of them was actually being tested. The unaware individual, called the â€Å"teacher† would sit in a separate room, administering memory relatedRead MoreBlindly Obeying Authority Essay1787 Words   |  8 PagesHolocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and neglected their conscience reflecting how this can be destructive in experiences of real life. On the contrary, Diana Baumrind pointed out in her article ‘Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience’ that the experiments were not valid hence useless. Summary of the Experiment In Stanley Milgram’s ‘The Perils of Obedience’, Milgram conducted experiments with theRead MoreMilgram Experiment Essay1532 Words   |  7 PagesBaumrind vs. Milgram debate Milgram’s experiment was an experiment that tested whether people would people would administer shock to another person even though the person receiving the shock would refuse to participate. During the experiment, Milgram would have the subject be the teacher and the other person people the student. While Milgram believed the experiment produced great results, a lady named Diana Baumrind believed the experiment should have not been conducted at all. Baumrind believedRead MoreDiana Baumrind2963 Words   |  12 PagesDiana Blumberg Baumrind is a clinical and developmental psychologist that specializes in parenting styles. Baumrind was born on August 23, 1927 in a small Jewish community in New York City; she was the first of two daughters born to Hyman and Mollie Blumberg. Baumrind earned a B.A. in philosophy at Hunter College in 1948. She later received her M.A. and Ph. D. in Psychology at the University of California, Berkley; she studied developmental, clinical, and social p sychology. Her doctoral dissertation