Stanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind - 1671 Words

Obedience: Does it have its limits? When individuals abandon their own freedom for the benefit of the larger group, they are no longer individuals but products of conformity. Obedience to authority can become dangerous when morals and independent thought are stifled to the point that harm is inflicted upon another person. The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders, even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrinds Review of Stanley Milgrams Experiments on Obedience says that Milgram†¦show more content†¦Milgrams experiment was believed to effect an alteration in the subjects self-image(Baumrind 332). Normal people would go into Milgrams lab expecting to just take part in an experiment, but would in fact be traumatized for possibly the rest of their life. Not only was se lf-image jeopardized, but so was the subjects trust in the experimenter. Because of this experiment, many of the adults that took part in this experiment are believed, by Baumrind, to have the inability to trust adult authorities in the future (332). When told the truth about the experiment, the subject was probably embarrassed and felt like a fool. Many of the subjects experienced severe distress after the experiment. This could be from the anger that they wanted to express towards the experimenter or from the shock of what had just happened to them. Baumrind makes some very convincing points about the disaster that is caused to many of the subjects, but Milgram believes differently. Milgram believed that this experiment provided a way of release for these sadistic impulses. While many might have had negative effects, many responded postively to the survey shown in Milgrams study. This experiment taught the subjects a little something about themselves. It also showed a side of the mselves that maybe they didnt know they had. It made many of them hope that they would deal more effectively with any future conflicts of values (Milgram 323). With the whole trust issue, if the experimenterShow MoreRelatedStanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind Essay1169 Words   |  5 PagesThe Controversy of Obedience A classic experiment on the natural obedience of individuals was designed and tested by a Yale psychologist, Stanley Milgram. The test forced participants to either go against their morals or violate authority. For the experiment, two people would come into the lab after being told they were testing memory loss, though only one of them was actually being tested. The unaware individual, called the â€Å"teacher† would sit in a separate room, administering memory relatedRead MoreBlindly Obeying Authority Essay1787 Words   |  8 PagesHolocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and neglected their conscience reflecting how this can be destructive in experiences of real life. On the contrary, Diana Baumrind pointed out in her article ‘Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience’ that the experiments were not valid hence useless. Summary of the Experiment In Stanley Milgram’s ‘The Perils of Obedience’, Milgram conducted experiments with theRead MoreMilgram Experiment Essay1532 Words   |  7 PagesBaumrind vs. Milgram debate Milgram’s experiment was an experiment that tested whether people would people would administer shock to another person even though the person receiving the shock would refuse to participate. During the experiment, Milgram would have the subject be the teacher and the other person people the student. While Milgram believed the experiment produced great results, a lady named Diana Baumrind believed the experiment should have not been conducted at all. Baumrind believedRead MoreDiana Baumrind2963 Words   |  12 PagesDiana Blumberg Baumrind is a clinical and developmental psychologist that specializes in parenting styles. Baumrind was born on August 23, 1927 in a small Jewish community in New York City; she was the first of two daughters born to Hyman and Mollie Blumberg. Baumrind earned a B.A. in philosophy at Hunter College in 1948. She later received her M.A. and Ph. D. in Psychology at the University of California, Berkley; she studied developmental, clinical, and social p sychology. Her doctoral dissertation

Privacy And Its Effect On Society - 1030 Words

Everyone is entitled to a certain level of privacy in regards to their personal information. However, there is the constant increase and enhancement in technology and the growing value of information for use in decision making. Between these two facts, the definition of privacy becomes unclear and allows people to gather information that one might deem confidential. Privacy has been manipulated in efforts claiming that as long as it is beneficial in the long run to a wholesome amount of people then it is allowed. There are multiple forces to maintain personal information and ensure everyone’s private data is not breached. Technology allows culture to evolve by creating solutions to problems by removing constraints that exist. Every invention or concept is expanded on to create the utmost perfect solution. Although this process can take decades, or even centuries, to actually develop a proficient resolution, the end result is what advances society industrially. There are conf licting views, however, if these advances are beneficially or maliciously affecting society (Coget). New types of data such as your habits, whereabouts, and daily routines are just a handful of the things that technology can now track. Samsung and Google are two of the large, renown companies that have encountered legal issues by tracking such personal information. Samsung was investigated by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) when the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) had complaintsShow MoreRelatedPrivacy And Its Effect On Society Essay1627 Words   |  7 PagesPrivacy can be defined as â€Å"the claim of individuals, groups or institutions to determine when, how and to what extent information about them is communicated to others. It is our right to keep information about ourselves or even things important to us from the public. Privacy allows one to express themselves without the lingering eyes and judgement of the public at large. However, privacy as we know it ha s degraded much with the evolution of technology in our present-day culture. Its slowly beingRead MoreAn Invasion Of Privacy And Its Effects On Society1804 Words   |  8 PagesI. Introduction of the problem or topic: a. An invasion of privacy is when something inaccessible to the public is intruded upon or exposed without one’s permission. Privacy is the ability for one to select and control information revealed about themselves. b. Introduce the problem or topic i. The government constantly collects personal data from citizens without their permission. ii. The information collected should be limited and only obtained after notifying the person that is being examinedRead MoreWhy Privacy Matters So If You Have Nothing?935 Words   |  4 PagesIn support of privacy, Daniel J. Solove wrote, Why Privacy Matters Even If You Have ‘Nothing to Hide.’ Solove begins his argument by introducing the nothing-to-hide argument. In general, the argument for surveillance is ‘if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear:’ hence people’s support for government efforts and regulations to ‘protect’ citizens by decreasing privacy. Those who object this argument target its most extreme cases. For example, if you have nothing to hide, could I takeRead MorePrivacy, Surveillance, And Law Essay1684 Words   |  7 Pagesexpected to trust the government, companies, and each other. Although scholars have provided several accounts of the importance of privacy, it still remains unclear how individuals view and value it. For the purposes of this essay, privacy is broadly defined as the controlled access to personal information or ideas. In this paper, I will examine Richard Posner’s article â€Å"Privacy, Surveillance, and Law† and Neil Richards’s paper â€Å"The Dangers of Surveillance.† Although both Posner and Richards begin withRead MoreThe Positive And Negative Effects Of Privacy And Social Media1518 Words   |  7 PagesThe Oxford dictionary defines Privacy as the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people (2017). It should not come as a surprise that websites designed to share pictures, ideas, and what is for dinner, leave individuals feeling that their privacy has been invaded. It is also not surprising that some people are oblivious to the effects of what they post online. It is safe to say the loss of privacy can be self-imposed for societies need to collaborate and socializedRead MoreAnalys is Of George Orwell s 1984848 Words   |  4 Pages Critical Analysis In the George Orwell’s novel 1984, much of the society is watched and have no privacy of any kind. Every person in the Party is under surveillance. In effect, these people cannot live freely and independently, but it seems to be an impossible task because of of the Party surveillance, and how they limit thinking and manipulate reality. We can similarly see these concerns and their effects in today s society and the ways the novel also acts as a warning for the future. In 1984Read MoreThe Invasion Of Privacy And Concern For Safety1624 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction: The invasion of privacy and concern for safety has been an increasing worry among people who live in the United States and across the world. The main issue is how does the government’s actions change how people view their own security and even national security. Broader theories of this research question would be how the government’s interaction with technology and security influence how people think about their own personal privacy and safety as well as our national security. SomeRead MorePrivacy Rights : Moral And Legal Foundations1312 Words   |  6 Pagesmorals play in shaping privacy rights and/or expectations? It is understood that there are a number of definitions of privacy. Intellectuals have published works with varying content throughout the years. In 1890, Warren and Brandeis’ article gathered that privacy is the â€Å"right to be let alone† (Samuel Warren). Additionally, William Parent suggested that â€Å"privacy is the condition of not having undocumented personal knowledge about one possessed by others† (Moore, Privacy Rights: Moral and LegalRead MoreThe Right Of Privacy Assignment1224 Words   |  5 PagesRight of Privacy Assignment Brian Taylor – GEICO BUS 220 Dictionary.com provides a definition of individual privacy which reads; â€Å"Freedom from damaging publicity, public scrutiny, secret surveillance, or unauthorized disclosure of one s personal data or information, as by a government, corporation, or individual†. On a basic level, the right of individual privacy simply means that one has the right to be left alone. This is a right many in our society claim to hold as inalienable, yet in ourRead MorePrivacy Rights : Moral And Legal Foundations1584 Words   |  7 Pagesnumber of definitions of privacy. Intellectuals have published works with varying content throughout the years. In 1890, Warren and Brandeis’ article gathered that privacy is the â€Å"right to be let alone† (Samuel Warren). Additionally, William Parent suggested that â€Å"privacy is the condition of not having undocumented personal knowledge about one possessed by others† (Moore, Privacy Rights: Moral and Legal Foundations). On the oth er hand, Julie Inness illustrated that privacy is â€Å"the state of possessing

A Day in Court free essay sample

I am watching what seems to be a strange trial. I see two figures, one clad in awhite gown with sharply-edged, geometric trim (also in white), and the otherdraped in a flowing, gauzy rose gown standing before a judge. Then I hear theperson in white speak. Your Honor, I am the attorney representing MissJennifer Drivers left brain, the logical, analytical side, while my colleaguerepresents her right brain, the aesthetic, feeling side. We are here to debatewhich side should be dominant in Miss Driver. Clearly, Your Honor, as we proceed,you will see that her left brain deserves to be in charge. Logic demands it.Consider the following: All her life, Miss Driver has delighted in math, aleft-brain subject. From an early age, she loved to solve jigsaw puzzles and, infact, completed several challenging 500-piece puzzles that her proud parentsglued together and framed. And, Your Honor, please think about Miss Driverspropensity for driving to the heart of a calculus problem, and the ensuing rushshe experiences on reaching her solution. We will write a custom essay sample on A Day in Court or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Note her fascination as she observes aclimactic torque physics lab. Then, watch her eyes light up as sheplunks down a contending Scrabble word. Please do consider, YourHonor, the importance of Miss Drivers left brain in arenas outside thoseassociated with academic learning. Take, for example, Christmas Day in the Driverhome. The gifts have been opened, and the do-it-yourself assembly kits remainuntouched on the living room floor. Mom, Dad, Sister and Brother becomepreoccupied with their new books, CDs and Did You Know factcalendars. Who do you suppose happily sits down with these kits, reads theircryptic directions, and figures out how to put together what is supposed to be aCD rack or a multi-purpose display case on wheels? The world todayis one in which left-brain technology rules. There is no question that MissDriver needs to have this part of her brain dominate if she is to be a keyparticipant in the world of the twenty-first century. Thank you. I rest mycase. Next, I hear the judge request that the attorney representingmy right brain present her position. I watch as the person in the flowing rosegown steps forward. Your Honor, I am sure that the views presentedfor left-brain dominance in Miss Jennifer Driver are valid as far as they go -but unfortunately they miss the essence of Miss Driver her joy in the creativeprocess and in helping others. Art, both visual and performance, has always helda place in her heart. Her charcoal drawings and brick-colored pottery adorn herhome. Then there is the framed black and white photograph of a windsweptcornfield in Wisconsin that convinced her predominantly left-brained brother thateven corn is beautiful. Miss Drivers passionate commitment to dance has alsobeen a major focus in her life. Watch as she performs at a ballet recital aVivaldi pas de deux finale, or how in her modern dance solo, accompanied by themusic of Natalie Imbruglia, she interprets a young womans encounter with thecity through turns, leaps and gestures. And, if you will, please humor sing along with me: Put your right foot in, put your right foot out, put yourright foot in, and shake it all about Now do the Hokey Pokey Let us notunderestimate the significance of the Hokey Pokey and Rock Around the Clock,the tunes Miss Driver introduced to 17 four-year-olds she met through theAssistance League of Southern California. She developed a cognitive skills/danceprogram, taught it, and documented each childs progress in learning shape anddirectionality skills. Your Honor, this undertaking was the work of the rightbrain! Please consider that while her left brain may help her achieve her goals,it is her right brain that determines what goals she values. Thankyou. I feel the silence envelop the court. The minutes pass slowly.Finally, the judge reaches her verdict. It is understandable thatthe two of you are at odds. You are both right and wrong. Miss Drivers logicaland analytical left brain not only helps her succeed, but also plays a role inplanning the direction of her future. Her right brains love of creativity andcompassionate regard for others not only defines the values she places on hergoals, but also empowers her. It is this courts opinion that both the left andright sides of the brain are of equal importance to Miss Driver. Neither the leftnor the right brain shall dominate. I hear the resounding crash of agavel at the same time that my alarm clock blasts me out of bed. I sit back on mybed and gingerly rub my head; it is intact. Left-brain or right-brain dominance?Was that what I was dreaming about? My mind, I think to myself, is a place forboth left- and right-brain thinking. And, if tallies were to be made, it would bea blessed tie. Editors Note: Jennifer now attends Brown University,making this a successful essay!

It Is Always A Mystery About How The Universe Began, Whether If And Wh

It is always a mystery about how the universe began, whether if and when it will end. Astronomers construct hypotheses called cosmological models that try to find the answer. There are two types of models: Big Bang and Steady State. However, through many observational evidences, the Big Bang theory can best explain the creation of the universe. The Big Bang model postulates that about 15 to 20 billion years ago, the universe violently exploded into being, in an event called the Big Bang. Before the Big Bang, all of the matter and radiation of our present universe were packed together in the primeval fireball--an extremely hot dense state from which the universe rapidly expanded.1 The Big Bang was the start of time and space. The matter and radiation of that early stage rapidly expanded and cooled. Several million years later, it condensed into galaxies. The universe has continued to expand, and the galaxies have continued moving away from each other ever since. Today the universe i s still expanding, as astronomers have observed. The Steady State model says that the universe does not evolve or change in time. There was no beginning in the past, nor will there be change in the future. This model assumes the perfect cosmological principle. This principle says that the universe is the same everywhere on the large scale, at all times.2 It maintains the same average density of matter forever. There are observational evidences found that can prove the Big Bang model is more reasonable than the Steady State model. First, the redshifts of distant galaxies. Redshift is a Doppler effect which states that if a galaxy is moving away, the spectral line of that galaxy observed will have a shift to the red end. The faster the galaxy moves, the more shift it has. If the galaxy is moving closer, the spectral line will show a blue shift. If the galaxy is not moving, there is no shift at all. However, as astronomers observed, the more distance a galaxy is located from Earth, the more redshift it shows on the spectrum. This means the further a galaxy is, the faster it moves. Therefore, the universe is expanding, and the Big Bang model seems more reasonable than the Steady State model. The second observational evidence is the radiation produced by the Big Bang. The Big Bang model predicts that the universe should still be filled with a small remnant of radiation left over from the original violent explosion of the primeval fireball in the past. The primeval fireball would have sent strong shortwave radiation in all directions into space. In time, that radiation would spread out, cool, and fill the expanding universe uniformly. By now it would strike Earth as microwave radiation. In 1965 physicists Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson detected microwave radiation coming equally from all directions in the sky, day and night, all year.3 And so it appears that astronomers have detected the fireball radiation that was produced by the Big Bang. This casts serious doubt on the Steady State model. The Steady State could not explain the existence of this radiation, so the model cannot best explain the beginning of the universe. Since the Big Bang model is the better model, the existence and the future of the universe can also be explained. Around 15 to 20 billion years ago, time began. The points that were to become the universe exploded in the primeval fireball called the Big Bang. The exact nature of this explosion may never be known. However, recent theoretical breakthroughs, based on the principles of quantum theory, have suggested that space, and the matter within it, masks an infinitesimal realm of utter chaos, where events happen randomly, in a state called quantum weirdness.4 Before the universe began, this chaos was all there was. At some time, a portion of this randomness happened to form a bubble, with a temperature in excess of 10 to the power of 34 degrees Kelvin. Being that hot, naturally it expanded. For an extremely brief an d short period, billionths of billionths of a second, it inflated. At the end of the period of inflation, the universe may have a diameter of a few centimetres. The It Is Always A Mystery About How The Universe Began, Whether If And Wh It is always a mystery about how the universe began, whether if and when it will end. Astronomers construct hypotheses called cosmological models that try to find the answer. There are two types of models: Big Bang and Steady State. However, through many observational evidences, the Big Bang theory can best explain the creation of the universe. The Big Bang model postulates that about 15 to 20 billion years ago, the universe violently exploded into being, in an event called the Big Bang. Before the Big Bang, all of the matter and radiation of our present universe were packed together in the primeval fireball--an extremely hot dense state from which the universe rapidly expanded.1 The Big Bang was the start of time and space. The matter and radiation of that early stage rapidly expanded and cooled. Several million years later, it condensed into galaxies. The universe has continued to expand, and the galaxies have continued moving away from each other ever since. Today the universe i s still expanding, as astronomers have observed. The Steady State model says that the universe does not evolve or change in time. There was no beginning in the past, nor will there be change in the future. This model assumes the perfect cosmological principle. This principle says that the universe is the same everywhere on the large scale, at all times.2 It maintains the same average density of matter forever. There are observational evidences found that can prove the Big Bang model is more reasonable than the Steady State model. First, the redshifts of distant galaxies. Redshift is a Doppler effect which states that if a galaxy is moving away, the spectral line of that galaxy observed will have a shift to the red end. The faster the galaxy moves, the more shift it has. If the galaxy is moving closer, the spectral line will show a blue shift. If the galaxy is not moving, there is no shift at all. However, as astronomers observed, the more distance a galaxy is located from Earth, the more redshift it shows on the spectrum. This means the further a galaxy is, the faster it moves. Therefore, the universe is expanding, and the Big Bang model seems more reasonable than the Steady State model. The second observational evidence is the radiation produced by the Big Bang. The Big Bang model predicts that the universe should still be filled with a small remnant of radiation left over from the original violent explosion of the primeval fireball in the past. The primeval fireball would have sent strong shortwave radiation in all directions into space. In time, that radiation would spread out, cool, and fill the expanding universe uniformly. By now it would strike Earth as microwave radiation. In 1965 physicists Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson detected microwave radiation coming equally from all directions in the sky, day and night, all year.3 And so it appears that astronomers have detected the fireball radiation that was produced by the Big Bang. This casts serious doubt on the Steady State model. The Steady State could not explain the existence of this radiation, so the model cannot best explain the beginning of the universe. Since the Big Bang model is the better model, the existence and the future of the universe can also be explained. Around 15 to 20 billion years ago, time began. The points that were to become the universe exploded in the primeval fireball called the Big Bang. The exact nature of this explosion may never be known. However, recent theoretical breakthroughs, based on the principles of quantum theory, have suggested that space, and the matter within it, masks an infinitesimal realm of utter chaos, where events happen randomly, in a state called quantum weirdness.4 Before the universe began, this chaos was all there was. At some time, a portion of this randomness happened to form a bubble, with a temperature in excess of 10 to the power of 34 degrees Kelvin. Being that hot, naturally it expanded. For an extremely brief an d short period, billionths of billionths of a second, it inflated. At the end of the period of inflation, the universe may have a diameter of a few centimetres. The